ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The coronavirus pandemic has had an extremely negative impact on the patients with diabetes mellitus (DM both in terms of a more severe course of COVID -19 and an increased risk of death. AIM: Analysis of risk factors for death due to COVID -19 in patients with DM type 1 and type 2 (DM1 and DM2). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the database of the national diabetes register (NDR), which included DM patients with COVID-19 and reported virus infection outcome (recovery/or death) in 15 712 DM1 and 322 279 DM2 patients during a 2-year follow-up period (01/02/2020 to 03/04/2022) (discharge date)). RESULT(S): Case fatality rate in patients with DM, who underwent COVID -19 was 17.1% (DM1-8.8%;DM2-17.5%). As a result of multivariate regression analysis of seven significant factors in DM1 and thirteen in DM2 (evaluated by univariate anlisys), a number of the most important predictors of risk for fatal outcome were identified: in DM1 these were age >=65 years (OR =4.01, 95% CI: 1.42-11.36), presence of arterial hypertension (AH) (OR =2.72, 95% CI: 1.03 -7.16) and diabetic foot syndrome (DFS) (OR = 7.22, 95% CI: 1.98-26.29);for T2DM: age >= 65 years (OR =2.53, 95% CI: 1.96-3.27), male (OR =1.51, 95% CI: 1.23-1.84), duration DM >=10 years (OR =2.01, 95% CI: 1.61-2.51), BMI >= 30 kg/m2 (OR =1.26, 95% CI: 1.02-1.55), ASCVD/CKD (OR =1.49, 95% CI: 1.01-2.04), history of diabetic coma (OR =12.97, 95% CI: 1.89-88.99) and presence of disability (OR =1.40, 95% CI: 1.14-1.73). In T2DM, the type of antidiabetic therapy (ADT) prior to COVID -19 (last visit before the development of infection) had a significant impact: Insulin therapy (OR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.30-2.07), sulfonylureas (SU) (OR =1.51, 95% CI: 1.23-1.84));dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (iDPP-4) therapy (OR =0.57, 95% CI: 0.39-0.83) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (iSGLT2) therapy (OR =0.64, 95% CI: 0.46-0.88). Vaccination was the most important protective factor in both types of DM: DM1 OR =0.19, 95% CI: 0.06-0.59;SD2 OR =0.20, 95% CI: 0.16-0.26. CONCLUSION(S): The common risk factor for fatal outcome in both DM1 and DM2 was age >=65 years;in DM1 - history of hypertension and DFS, in DM2 - male sex, diabetes duration >=10 years, BMI >=30 kg/m2, history of ASCVD/CKD and diabetic coma, disability. In T2DM, significant differences in risk were observed depending on the type of ADT: insulin and SU therapy were factors that increased the risk of death, whereas therapy with iDPP-4 and iSGLT2 reduced the risk of death. Vaccination reduced the risk of death in DM1 and DM2 by 5.2 and 5-fold, respectively.Copyright © Endocrinology Research Centre, 2022.
ABSTRACT
Background: The Covid-19 lockdown imposed all across the nation substantially disturbed the lifestyle and dietary habits among Indians, and this can be particular concern among individuals with diabetes. Objective(s): To understand the impact of lockdown on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes, and to evaluate the healthcare practitioner (HCP) treatment preferences. Method(s): This systematic survey was done among 126 HCPs in whom a structured objective questionnaire was administered. The survey collected data related to the proportion of patients with poor glycemic control, its causes, and treatment preferences. Result(s): For the pre lockdown scenario, 37% and 48% of HCPs respectively, opined that 10-20% and 20-40% of their patients had HbA1c >8.5%. Only 10.3% HCPs reported 40-60% patients presented with high HbA1c respectively. However, for the post lockdown scenario, 8.7% and 42% of HCPs respectively, reported that 10-20% and 20-40% of their patients had HbA1c >8.5%. A notable 42% of HCPs admitted that after the lockdown 40-60% of their patients presented with HbA1c >8.5%. While 4% of HCPs reported uncontrolled glycemia in >60% of their patients before lockdown this proportion considerably increased to 7% for post lockdown scenario. HCPs perceived excess carbohydrate consumption and the lack of physical activity as the main causes of uncontrolled glycemia followed by poor medication adherence and stress. Of all the respondents, 53% agreed that they will prefer triple-drug therapy in more than 30% of their patients with HbA1c values above 8.5%. More than half of the HCPs mentioned that they would choose triple-drug therapy (Glimepiride+ metformin+ voglibose fixeddose combination) over other antidiabetics to manage the uncontrolled glycemia in their patients. Conclusion(s): The survey findings indicated an increase in the proportion of patients with HbA1c >8.5% after the lockdown as compared to the pre-lockdown phase. The altered nutritional behavior and reduced physical activity during lockdown are believed to be the major contributors to such an alarming rise in the proportion of patients with uncontrolled diabetes. Clinically, the triple-drug FDC (Glimepiride+ metformin+ voglibose) is perceived as the choice of therapy to achieve optimal glycemic control by a majority of HCPs.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The coronavirus pandemic has had an extremely negative impact on the patients with diabetes mellitus (DM both in terms of a more severe course of COVID -19 and an increased risk of death. AIM: Analysis of risk factors for death due to COVID -19 in patients with DM type 1 and type 2 (DM1 and DM2). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the database of the national diabetes register (NDR), which included DM patients with COVID-19 and reported virus infection outcome (recovery/or death) in 15 712 DM1 and 322 279 DM2 patients during a 2-year follow-up period (01/02/2020 to 03/04/2022) (discharge date)). RESULT(S): Case fatality rate in patients with DM, who underwent COVID -19 was 17.1% (DM1-8.8%;DM2-17.5%). As a result of multivariate regression analysis of seven significant factors in DM1 and thirteen in DM2 (evaluated by univariate anlisys), a number of the most important predictors of risk for fatal outcome were identified: in DM1 these were age >=65 years (OR =4.01, 95% CI: 1.42-11.36), presence of arterial hypertension (AH) (OR =2.72, 95% CI: 1.03 -7.16) and diabetic foot syndrome (DFS) (OR = 7.22, 95% CI: 1.98-26.29);for T2DM: age >= 65 years (OR =2.53, 95% CI: 1.96-3.27), male (OR =1.51, 95% CI: 1.23-1.84), duration DM >=10 years (OR =2.01, 95% CI: 1.61-2.51), BMI >= 30 kg/m2 (OR =1.26, 95% CI: 1.02-1.55), ASCVD/CKD (OR =1.49, 95% CI: 1.01-2.04), history of diabetic coma (OR =12.97, 95% CI: 1.89-88.99) and presence of disability (OR =1.40, 95% CI: 1.14-1.73). In T2DM, the type of antidiabetic therapy (ADT) prior to COVID -19 (last visit before the development of infection) had a significant impact: Insulin therapy (OR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.30-2.07), sulfonylureas (SU) (OR =1.51, 95% CI: 1.23-1.84));dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (iDPP-4) therapy (OR =0.57, 95% CI: 0.39-0.83) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (iSGLT2) therapy (OR =0.64, 95% CI: 0.46-0.88). Vaccination was the most important protective factor in both types of DM: DM1 OR =0.19, 95% CI: 0.06-0.59;SD2 OR =0.20, 95% CI: 0.16-0.26. CONCLUSION(S): The common risk factor for fatal outcome in both DM1 and DM2 was age >=65 years;in DM1 - history of hypertension and DFS, in DM2 - male sex, diabetes duration >=10 years, BMI >=30 kg/m2, history of ASCVD/CKD and diabetic coma, disability. In T2DM, significant differences in risk were observed depending on the type of ADT: insulin and SU therapy were factors that increased the risk of death, whereas therapy with iDPP-4 and iSGLT2 reduced the risk of death. Vaccination reduced the risk of death in DM1 and DM2 by 5.2 and 5-fold, respectively. Copyright © Endocrinology Research Centre, 2022.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The coronavirus pandemic has had an extremely negative impact on the patients with diabetes mellitus (DM both in terms of a more severe course of COVID -19 and an increased risk of death. AIM: Analysis of risk factors for death due to COVID -19 in patients with DM type 1 and type 2 (DM1 and DM2). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the database of the national diabetes register (NDR), which included DM patients with COVID-19 and reported virus infection outcome (recovery/or death) in 15 712 DM1 and 322 279 DM2 patients during a 2-year follow-up period (01/02/2020 to 03/04/2022) (discharge date)). RESULT(S): Case fatality rate in patients with DM, who underwent COVID -19 was 17.1% (DM1-8.8%;DM2-17.5%). As a result of multivariate regression analysis of seven significant factors in DM1 and thirteen in DM2 (evaluated by univariate anlisys), a number of the most important predictors of risk for fatal outcome were identified: in DM1 these were age >=65 years (OR =4.01, 95% CI: 1.42-11.36), presence of arterial hypertension (AH) (OR =2.72, 95% CI: 1.03 -7.16) and diabetic foot syndrome (DFS) (OR = 7.22, 95% CI: 1.98-26.29);for T2DM: age >= 65 years (OR =2.53, 95% CI: 1.96-3.27), male (OR =1.51, 95% CI: 1.23-1.84), duration DM >=10 years (OR =2.01, 95% CI: 1.61-2.51), BMI >= 30 kg/m2 (OR =1.26, 95% CI: 1.02-1.55), ASCVD/CKD (OR =1.49, 95% CI: 1.01-2.04), history of diabetic coma (OR =12.97, 95% CI: 1.89-88.99) and presence of disability (OR =1.40, 95% CI: 1.14-1.73). In T2DM, the type of antidiabetic therapy (ADT) prior to COVID -19 (last visit before the development of infection) had a significant impact: Insulin therapy (OR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.30-2.07), sulfonylureas (SU) (OR =1.51, 95% CI: 1.23-1.84));dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (iDPP-4) therapy (OR =0.57, 95% CI: 0.39-0.83) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (iSGLT2) therapy (OR =0.64, 95% CI: 0.46-0.88). Vaccination was the most important protective factor in both types of DM: DM1 OR =0.19, 95% CI: 0.06-0.59;SD2 OR =0.20, 95% CI: 0.16-0.26. CONCLUSION(S): The common risk factor for fatal outcome in both DM1 and DM2 was age >=65 years;in DM1 - history of hypertension and DFS, in DM2 - male sex, diabetes duration >=10 years, BMI >=30 kg/m2, history of ASCVD/CKD and diabetic coma, disability. In T2DM, significant differences in risk were observed depending on the type of ADT: insulin and SU therapy were factors that increased the risk of death, whereas therapy with iDPP-4 and iSGLT2 reduced the risk of death. Vaccination reduced the risk of death in DM1 and DM2 by 5.2 and 5-fold, respectively. Copyright © Endocrinology Research Centre, 2022.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: No study has yet systematically evaluated the effect of antidiabetic therapy on clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the effect of different antidiabetic therapy on clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients with T2D. METHODS: We comprehensively retrieved the published research which examined the effect of antidiabetic therapy on clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients with T2D. The odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for clinical outcomes were calculated using the random-effects model, and meta-regression was adopted to evaluate the potential sources of heterogeneity between studies. RESULTS: A total of 54 studies were included in this study. We found that the use of metformin (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.58-0.75), SGLT-2i (OR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.73-0.88), and GLP-1ra (OR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.70-0.98) were significantly associated with lower mortality risk in COVID-19 patients with T2D, while insulin use might unexpectedly increase the ICU admission rate (OR = 2.32, 95% CI: 1.34-4.01) and risk of death (OR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.32-1.75). No statistically significant associations were identified for DPP-4i, SUs, AGIs, and TZDs. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: We demonstrated that the usage of metformin, SGLT-2i, and GLP-1ra could significantly decrease mortality in COVID-19 patients with T2D. The heterogeneity across the studies, baseline characteristics of the included patients, shortage of dosage and the duration of antidiabetic drugs and autonomy of drug selection might limit the objectivity and accuracy of results. Further adequately powered and high-quality randomized controlled trials are warranted for conclusive findings.